Thursday, February 28, 2008

Must America be a theocracy?

After a succession of Republican-sponsored theocracies starting with the presidency of Ronald Reagan and continuing to the present administration of President George W. Bush, the Democratic party has just about had enough, and it believes the same of the American people.

Gradually increasing in strength from a modestly God-affirming but strongly ground-standing President like Ronald Reagan, who could perhaps be compared to one of the Crusader kings of the Middle Ages, the Republican dynasty came close to establishing a new emperor Constantine in George W. Bush. More aggressively supportive of Christian causes than his father the elder President George Bush, his career relative to his father’s in some ways reflected that of emperor Contantine relative to his father, Constantius Chlorus. But unless you know the history of the later Roman Empire, such comparisons are probably irrelevant. Suffice it to say that in the current President we have as close as we could expect to come to having a Christian emperor like Constantine the Great. Since the critics of Republican politics call it a theocracy, let me ask this question.

Which do you prefer, a theocracy with an anointed emperor at the helm, or a theocracy centered on a divine savior? America seems to be hell-bent on having one or the other. Oddly, though, since we are possibly the most materialist nation of all time and, though we give lip-service to whatever we are free to call “God,” we’re much better at trying to save others than we are at saving ourselves. I mean, economically, politically, socially and religiously, we want to save the world, but we would rather be left alone ourselves, to pursue our private “dreams.” We’re very generous with others, very reckless with ourselves, and our brand of Christianity follows suit.

Again, I ask, which do you prefer, a theocracy with an emperor, or one ruled by a god?

Myself, there is only one Theocracy, and it’s neither emulated nor represented by any current institution on earth, not church, not state. Despite America’s “manifest destiny,” I cannot and will not attribute to America the role of savior-nation to the world. There’s only one nation that has been given that role.

Who knows why we have this fatal bent in our American psyche, but we must have a theocracy at all costs, at any cost, even if it means giving to a mere man the worship that belongs only to the Most High.
πολλοι ελευσονται επι τω ονοματι μου λεγοντες οτι εγω ειμι και πολλους πλανησουσιν (Mark 13:6)

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

Absurdly overwrought and hyper-partisan political opinions are oddly discordant with the hyper-pious tone of this blog.

Ρωμανός ~ Romanós said...

Duh… well, I suppose that beauty is in the eye of the beholder and, whoever you are, Anonymous, it's your pious sensibilities that my poor attempt at blogging may have offended. It was never my intention to publish a hyper-pious blog. If somehow you've been misled into thinking that piety, hyper or otherwise, was ever my intention, I apologise, and simply tell you straight out—I am not trying to be pious. Funny you should by your comment make me think of finishing a post I was working on, entitled "Liturgical Piety in an Age of Slaughter." I'm still not sure whether it's the right time to put into words what lies behind that proffered title, but whenever, if ever, I do publish it, there will be no mistaking my meaning. Go with God, anonymously, and see where He leads you. "Who the sheep may be, God knows… but the goats are such as I."

My intention in this post was simply to apprise the brethren of the peril of these times. I go with Him who said, "My kingdom is not of this world."

Jim Swindle said...

Your post makes me think of how odd it is that most Americans who claim to be Christians seem to support one of two strange sets of political beliefs. One side thinks it's godly to protect assault weapons, tobacco companies, and near-monopolies, while fighting against immigrants. The other side thinks it's godly to protect abortion, homosexual expression, and the politics of victimization. Neither side wants a fiscal policy that is likely to be sound long-term. I think both sides would benefit if they read the Bible humbly.

Yes, I'll vote, but reluctantly. Thanks for the reminder that our King's kingdom is not of this world.

Ρωμανός ~ Romanós said...

Thanks, Jim, for your rational comments, and I do think the sorts of things Christians in America support sometimes are really hard to justify. I can't imagine whom I will vote for in the presidential election yet, because I haven't found a candidate that I believe is viable in the office. It seems we're being herded into two camps by the political machine, all to no purpose. No Godly purpose, for sure. It makes me wonder if it's even possible anymore for a follower of Jesus to seek any political office. We are encouraged by church leaders and perhaps even by divine scripture to get involved in the political process, but is that perhaps only applicable when it's in a society of free men (truly free, I mean) who actually will vote for what they believe is right? When we're part of a political system as religiously pluralistic as was the Roman Empire before Constantine, can we really get involved in it? Rome was not a democracy like the United States, yet there were still many opportunities for men of common origins to enter the corridors of power. But do we find that Christians joined in that upward mobility then? If not, why not? Is it any easier for a Christian to fill a political office in America today, without compromising the very basis of his or her faith? For some Christians, this is possible, because they hold their "Christianity" as a private conviction. But for others, it's not possible or permissible to separate their Christian life from their public life. For such as these, I think it would be impossible to serve in the American political system of today. I know it would be impossible for me.

Andrew Kenny said...

It is almost laughable that both sides believe have God on their side.On the other hand it makes me want to weep at the deception they are under. The true Church always seems to do better spiritually when it is in a position of supposed weakness than power.THanks for the spiritual realism and honesty in your post, cutting through all the religious pretence. May God save America.